QI have a very small student loan, and my income is lower than the repayment threshold. I haven’t paid off any of the loan. I thought it was best to pay back as little as possible because it was interest-free. So I haven’t given it much attention.

But recently I noticed that my loan had grown much bigger. What I hadn’t realised was that I was being charged a $40 annual administration fee.

My initial loan was $370, so with a fee of $40 I was paying over 10 per cent in fees! It’s now $570. I’ll pay it all off before I get charged the next fee, which would be about 7 per cent of my current loan.

My partner has a $25,000 student loan, so she’s paying less than 0.2 per cent in fees. It makes sense for her to pay it back as slowly as possible.

But your readers should know that the flat-rate administration fees will mean it is best to pay back any student loan that’s less than about a couple of thousand dollars a.s.a.p.

AThanks for another “challenge” to my frequent advice about student loans.

What I usually say is to repay a student loan as slowly as possible, because they’re interest-free as long as you live in New Zealand.

The reasoning goes like this: Paying off, say, a credit card debt on which the interest is 20 per cent improves your wealth as much as earning 20 per cent on an investment, with no fees or tax. In other words, paying off the debt is a fantastic “investment”.

But paying off an interest-free student loan improves your wealth as much as earning nothing on an investment. Not particularly appealing. You’re better off to put any spare money into, say, a savings account, where it earns interest.

But the two challenges to that way of thinking are:

  • Ethical issues. A friend recently said it’s unethical not to repay a student loan as soon as you can. The taxpayers of New Zealand have given you the money to fund your studies, he says. It’s not fair to delay repaying that money.

This is hard to argue with, and years ago I used to say the same thing. More recently, though, I’ve realised that most people repay their student loan only when it’s taken out of their pay — at the rate of 12 per cent of everything they earn over $19,760 a year. It takes many years to repay a large loan.

It seems unfair to suggest people repay their loan faster, putting them at a disadvantage compared with most other people. But in the end, each person must decide how they feel about this.

  • Your point — if your loan is small, annual fees will make it grow fast percentagewise.

The $40 admin fee is charged by Inland Revenue if your account balance is $20 or more on March 31 each year — although it isn’t charged if you have paid an establishment fee to Studylink in that tax year.

“The $60 establishment fee is charged on each student loan contract entered into at the time the first drawdown (fees, course-related costs or living costs) is made,” says the Ministry of Social Development.

And you’re quite right. On a balance of less than a few thousand dollars, $40 is a considerable charge.

So paying back a small student loan makes sense financially. What’s more, you get a big tick on the ethical issue.

QJust a thought about last week’s column. Your correspondent says he (I’m assuming he) has built up a $500,000 KiwiSaver balance, but I can’t help wondering about his homemaker wife, as women are so often financially disadvantaged by being out of the paid workforce.

Perhaps now his balance is so healthy he should contribute to her KiwiSaver account instead. Maybe they’ve already done this, which would be great.

AYou make an excellent point. The correspondent listed the couple’s assets, but made no mention of a KiwiSaver account for his wife.

Some people still don’t realise that you don’t need to be employed to join KiwiSaver. You can sign up directly with a provider.

You won’t get employer contributions, of course. But you will get the government contribution, of 50 cents for every dollar you contribute, up to a maximum of $521 a year if you contribute $1042 or more.

It would be a pity for the wife — or anyone else who is self-employed or not in employment — to miss out on that money. It can add up over the years, especially if you consider compounding returns.

Let’s say you’re a non-employee and you contribute $86.84 a month — which comes to $1042 a year — to your savings.

  • In a non-KiwiSaver fund, after ten years you’ll have $12,200 in a middle-risk fund that earns 3 per cent a year after fees and tax. In a higher-risk fund that earns 6 per cent, you’ll have $14,300.
  • In a KiwiSaver fund, after ten years you’ll have $18,300 in the middle-risk fund, and $21,450 in the higher-risk fund. The government contribution makes the difference.
  • Over 30 years, outside KiwiSaver you’ll have $50,600 in the middle-risk fund and $85,600 in the higher-risk one.
  • Within KiwiSaver, over 30 years you’ll have $75,900 in middle risk, or $128,400 in higher risk. Those are not small amounts.

You might have noticed that the KiwiSaver numbers are one and a half times the non-KiwiSaver numbers. That’s simply because, with the government contributions, one and half times as much money has gone into the account each year.

There’s also another good reason for a non-working spouse or partner to have their own KiwiSaver account. It’s their money, and they can make their own decisions about how it’s invested and how it’s spent in retirement.

If a relationship ends, KiwiSaver money saved while the couple are together is usually treated as relationship property. But still, it’s psychologically good for each partner to have their own account.

QA family member is finishing paid employment shortly, to study further, for a year. What should be done about KiwiSaver payments?

ASee the Q&A above. The same thing applies to non-working students. It’s really good if they belong to KiwiSaver, and they — or perhaps a generous family member — can contribute $1042 a year, to get the government contribution.

QYou said last week that mortgage interest on rental properties is tax deductible. Has not the government scrapped this from 1st April this year?

ANo. And although landlords have seen their tax breaks dwindle, and rules around insulation and borrowing tighten, I can’t imagine a change to the deductibility of mortgage interest, which is clearly an expense.

According to Inland Revenue’s website, “You can claim the interest charged on money you’ve borrowed to buy your rental property. However, if you:

  • borrowed part of the money for another purpose, or
  • topped up the mortgage for another purpose, for example to consolidate debt or to buy the house you live in

you can only claim the interest that relates directly to the rental.”

For more on the rules, go to www.ird.govt.nz and do a search on “managing a rental property.”

QOur experience may be of assistance to your reader in the column two weeks ago who is considering moving to the Coromandel.

In 2012, both being fit and healthy, we moved to live in our beach house at the ages of 67 and 71. Our Auckland house was rented out with the assistance of a good rental agent. We chose to keep the same Auckland doctor, dentist and specialists.

The experience of living in a small coastal village was absolutely wonderful, and with a new beach house built in 2002, we had little maintenance and lots of good friends and neighbours. My husband was retired and joined a local conservation group to assist with pest control and maintaining an area of native bush.

However, after two years our doctor pointed out that by changing our address on his files we were now in the Waikato DHB. So we joined a local medical group but struggled to see the same doctor twice. My husband injured his shoulders and after six weeks of frustration we returned to our Auckland doctor and had the matter sorted in a day.

The nearest hospital is Thames, one and a half hours away, and there’s no 24-hour emergency clinic locally. In 2014, following an all-night episode of pain, I was told I was unable to see a doctor for two days, but was eventually seen by an emergency nurse who called the doctor. These experiences left me with little confidence for receiving adequate medical treatment in the area.

The outcome was that in 2016 we returned to Auckland, sold our Auckland house for $1.3 million and purchased a two-bedroom unit in a retirement village for $900,000, keeping our beach house for weekends and holidays.

If we had sold our Auckland house in 2012, we would not have received enough to buy the unit plus cash. The lock up and leave situation is the perfect answer, and we maintain the beach house with the assistance of our family.

The beach house will be sold eventually on the depletion of the $400,000 cash freed up from the sale of the Auckland house.

AYou raise an interesting point, that in smaller centres medical care will not be as comprehensive as in big cities.

It’s something to keep in mind, especially for older people thinking of moving to a small town or the countryside. It would be good to check out the medical services before moving — including talking to the locals about it, not just the doctors.

And the fact that you kept your Auckland house and rented it out certainly worked out well for you.

As it happened, Auckland house prices soared between 2012 and 2016. However, as I said two weeks ago, a repeat of that seems really unlikely in the next few years.

What’s more, our correspondent said, “We are however not keen to be landlords, with all the hassle that entails.” Speaking as someone who has been a reluctant long-distance landlord, I can vouch for the fact that it can be nightmarish when problems arise — with the tenants, the rental agent or the property itself. You may have been luckier landlords than you realise.

This is one of those situations in which there are risks whatever you do. And that can leave people accepting an unsatisfactory status quo because they’re afraid things will go wrong if they take action.

It’s better to sensibly weigh up the risks — including how you would cope in a worst case scenario — and then get on with doing what you want to do. Life is ticking by in the meantime.

QFor Father’s Day I and my daughter cook a meal together and invite the other fathers and family around.

Spending a day in the kitchen with her is one of the best days of the year. Feeding a dozen people for less than $20 shows her how to be creative and good with money. Lasagne this year, yum. No gifts.

AI love it. And your letter suggests that a wonderful gift from a child is to give their parent an opportunity to teach them something in a fun way.

Any other ideas for original Father’s Day celebrations that are not about spending big bucks are welcome.

Mary Holm is a freelance journalist, a director of Financial Services Complaints Ltd (FSCL), a seminar presenter and a bestselling author on personal finance. From 2011 to 2019 she was a founding director of the Financial Markets Authority. Her opinions are personal, and do not reflect the position of any organisation in which she holds office. Mary’s advice is of a general nature, and she is not responsible for any loss that any reader may suffer from following it. Send questions to [email protected] or click here. Letters should not exceed 200 words. We won’t publish your name. Please provide a (preferably daytime) phone number. Unfortunately, Mary cannot answer all questions, correspond directly with readers, or give financial advice.